Crypto exchanges
Platforms assessing an EU-facing operating model and CASP pathway.
European Union · CASP pathway
A structured route for digital-asset businesses preparing to serve European clients, coordinated with qualified professionals responsible for legal and regulatory work.
Direct engagement with the appointed professional service provider.

MiCA projects extend beyond one form and can require coordinated legal analysis, governance preparation, policy drafting and regulator responses.
Platforms assessing an EU-facing operating model and CASP pathway.
Businesses safeguarding client assets or providing regulated custody services.
Operators coordinating crypto transfers, settlement or payment functionality.
Companies adapting governance and compliance evidence for European expansion.
Final scope depends on the business model and appointed provider. A typical project may include the following areas without promising regulatory approval.
Map services, clients, asset flows and jurisdictions to authorization analysis.
Coordinate ownership, management, fit-and-proper and organization materials.
Develop AML, safeguarding, complaints, conflicts, outsourcing, risk and records workstreams.
Align business plans, financial resources, ICT and process descriptions.
Support assembly, submission preparation and regulator responses where included.
Research for this service
Indicative professional fee
USD 45,000-55,000
Usually structured around monthly or milestone payments after scope confirmation.
Regulator, government, incorporation, translation, travel and third-party costs may be separate.
Typical project horizon
Approx. 6 months
Timing depends on readiness, complexity, document quality and regulator response cycles.
Timing, authorization and commercial outcomes are not guaranteed.
Crypto License Desk coordinates the introduction and project path. The appointed provider confirms identity, scope, terms and timetable before contracting directly with the client.
A short Telegram or email conversation identifies the service category and target jurisdiction.
An appropriate qualified professional reviews the operating model at a high level.
The client receives provider identity, terms, timetable and scope before signing directly.
Documents, meetings and evidence are coordinated through defined workstreams.
Regulatory submission, response or project completion proceeds where included in scope.
Client preparation
The public website does not request sensitive ownership, funding or regulatory-history documents. Sensitive materials go directly to the appointed provider through an appropriate secure channel.
Not necessarily. Services, operating model, client location and transitional arrangements require professional analysis.
No. The appointed provider confirms final scope, exclusions, payment schedule and third-party costs.
The client contracts directly with the appointed qualified provider.
No. Regulators make independent decisions.
No. Sensitive material is transferred directly after provider and secure channel confirmation.
Start a conversation
No long form and no confidential upload. Contact the desk directly by Telegram or email.